Phone: (800) 917-6447

Director of Med/Surg, Telemetry, Peds and Skilled Nursing

February 15th, 2013

Location:  Marshalltown, IA

Morgan Hunter HealthSearch has been retained by Marshalltown Medical and Surgical Center, a progressive regional, Iowa medical center, to identify and recruit a new Director of Nursing for Medical/Surgical, Telemetry, Peds and Skilled Nursing.

This position serves as the senior administrative and clinical leader for a unit with a total of 50 beds and an ADC of 27-30.

The Director is accountable for providing leadership over day-to-day patient care, unit operations, quality, education, compliance, staff development and physician relations.  The Director will understand how to function as a servant leader in a shared governance model and be familiar with Studer principles.

The successful candidate will have 3-5 years of previous nursing leadership experience in a similar environment. An ability to work with a diverse nursing staff, have current nursing skill sets, and communicate effectively in order to support process improvement and further adoption of evidence-based practices.

Candidates must be BSN–prepared and BCLS certified.  A Masters’ degree is preferred.  Your management style should be team-centered and comfortable with a highly collaborative approach. You will be expected to be knowledgeable of changes facing overall healthcare delivery and be able to respond with actionable plans for your departments.  You should have well-developed assessment and mentoring aptitude.

Marshalltown is located in central Iowa with a population of 27,000.  This expanding city is a center for regional healthcare, high-tech companies, manufacturing, various recreational pursuits, and offers a long list of festivals and community events.  A divergent local education system offers well-regarded public and private academic environments, complemented by a community and undergraduate college. Housing options are varied and overall cost of living is affordable.

 About Morgan Hunter HealthSearch
Morgan Hunter HealthSearch (MHHS) provides Executive Search and Interim Leadership solutions for hospitals and health systems throughout the United States.  Our services include executive healthcare recruiting, retained healthcare executive search, healthcare interim management, executive placement for hospitals

Administrative Director of Diagnostic Imaging

February 15th, 2013

Location:  Marshalltown, IA

Morgan Hunter HealthSearch has been retained by Marshalltown Medical and Surgical Center, a progressive Iowa-based community hospital, to identify and recruit a new Administrative Director of Diagnostic Imaging.

This position serves as the senior administrative and technical leader for a department with radiology, CT, MRI, nuclear medicine, ultrasound and mammography, as well as special procedures.

The Administrative Director is accountable for providing vision, leadership, technical and administrative direction for strategic planning, budgeting, technology assessments, technical quality, patient safety, regulatory/accreditation compliance and physician relations.  Oversees the modalities of radiology, MRI, CT, nuclear medicine, ultrasound and special procedures.

The successful candidate will have a minimum of 3 years of previous healthcare leadership experience in a diagnostic services setting.  Graduation from an AMA-accredited school of Radiological Technology and ARRT registry are required.  A related bachelor’s degree and hands-on experience with general radiology, CT or Nuclear medicine are preferred.

Candidates must be team-centered, highly collaborative, and have a servant leader approach. You are expected to understand the big picture, as well as be conversant in the details, be able to recognize the needs of medical and technical staff and be able to communicate effectively.  You should  have well-developed analytical and planning skills, as well as have current understanding of technical and patient care trends in the larger diagnostic imaging community.

Marshalltown is located in central Iowa with a population of 27,000.  This expanding city is a center for regional healthcare, high-tech companies, manufacturing, various recreational pursuits, and offers a long list of festivals and community events.  A divergent local education system offers well-regarded public and private academic environments, complemented by a community and undergraduate college. Housing options are varied and overall cost of living is affordable.

 About Morgan Hunter HealthSearch
Morgan Hunter HealthSearch (MHHS) provides Executive Search and Interim Leadership solutions for hospitals and health systems throughout the United States.  Our services include executive healthcare recruiting, retained healthcare executive search, healthcare interim management, executive placement for hospitals

Director of Surgical Services

February 15th, 2013

Location:  Marshalltown, IA

Morgan Hunter HealthSearch has been retained by Marshalltown Medical and Surgical Center, a progressive Iowa-based community hospital, to identify and recruit a new Director of Surgical Services.

This position serves as the senior administrative and clinical leader for the perioperative department providing surgical services to a service area of approximately 60,000 residents.

The Director is accountable for providing clinical leadership and administrative direction for day-to-day operations, planning, budgeting, assessments of service, quality and patient safety, regulatory/accreditation and compliance.  Oversees the workflow for 40 nurses, technologists, and administrative/support staff.  The department has 8 suites with cases types included general surgery, orthopaedics, ophthalmology, GYN, c-sections, endoscopies, podiatric, dental and pain management.

The successful candidate will have a minimum of 3 years of previous healthcare leadership experience in a similar setting.  Candidates must be BSN-prepared have current BCLS.  Masters’ degree is preferred. Your management style must be that of a servant leader n a shared governance model and be familiar with Studer principles.

You will be expected to understand larger patient care trends in healthcare delivery, as well as be conversant in the details and how they affect your department.  You should be able to recognize the needs of medical and technical staff and be able to communicate effectively with them.  You should have well-developed analytical and planning skills, as well as full knowledge of all compliance and regulatory mandates for quality and safety of care.

Marshalltown is located in central Iowa with a population of 27,000.  This expanding city is a center for regional healthcare, high-tech companies, manufacturing, various recreational pursuits, and offers a long list of festivals and community events.  A divergent local education system offers well-regarded public and private academic environments, complemented by a community and undergraduate college. Housing options are varied and overall cost of living is affordable.

 About Morgan Hunter HealthSearch
Morgan Hunter HealthSearch (MHHS) provides Executive Search and Interim Leadership solutions for hospitals and health systems throughout the United States.  Our services include executive healthcare recruiting, retained healthcare executive search, healthcare interim management, executive placement for hospitals

5 Ways Hospitals Can Partner With Free Clinics

February 11th, 2013

Written by J. Stephen Lindsey, FACHE, and John “Trey” Rawles III | February 05, 2013, Becker’s Hospital Review

Are you prepared for the impending changes in reimbursement? Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, providers will see a shift from traditional fee for service to a value-based payment model that takes into account costs as well as quality of care. The new system will reward hospitals that provide care most efficiently, while reducing unnecessary services. As hospital finances become more closely tied to cost-effective health management of the population, some hospitals are forging partnerships with local free clinics in an effort to strengthen the medical safety net, and control their costs.

A 2010 Nationwide Survey of Free Clinics in the United States “suggests that free clinics are a much more important component of the ambulatory care safety net than generally recognized … in a context where more than 1,000 free clinics are estimated to serve 1.8 million mostly uninsured patients … annually.” The study concludes that as states expand their Medicaid programs, free clinics will adapt and continue to serve as “gap fillers … providing services such as medications … and health education” to help keep patients out of hospitals.1

In the new healthcare landscape, hospitals and free clinics can both reap benefits by working together in partnership. Here are five examples:

1. Referral programs. Free clinics generally provide ambulatory and chronic care for underinsured patients with non-emergent conditions. Hospital emergency departments, on the other hand, will provide acute care to stabilize any individual, regardless of their acuity or ability to pay. As hospital executives face decreasing reimbursements, some are finding referral programs with local free clinics can help them control costs. In these programs, ED staff members are prompted to refer underinsured, non-emergent patients who meet certain criteria to free clinics. Case managers determine when a free clinic would be better suited than a hospital ED to manage a patient’s care, then make the referral after the patient is discharged. While there are some upfront costs to set up these referral programs, they can ultimately save hospitals money and improve the quality of care for patients.

2. Sharing data. Hospitals usually have information systems that are more sophisticated than what free clinics have. Many hospitals could benefit from data sharing partnerships with free clinics. Despite some upfront costs, hospital executives are finding that clinical data sharing partnerships can help them more efficiently coordinate care and keep patients out of the hospital when their needs could be better met in a free clinic setting. Under the PPACA, such efficiencies will be crucial, as CMS will begin value-based reimbursements based on cost and quality. In preparation, more providers than ever are investing in electronic health record systems. These systems could be shared with free clinics in the community as they work in partnership with local hospitals.

In addition to clinical data, hospitals may also decide to share financial data with their free clinic partners, to determine return on investment. For example, in the case of a referral program, a hospital could run cost reports for a free clinic, including coding information related to patient acuity upon ED triage. The free clinic could use these reports to compare ED utilization figures before and after the referral program, to determine if their interventions were successful in keeping low-acuity patients out of the hospital.

3. Patient-centered medical home initiatives.
The PPACA created the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, which is currently testing care delivery models seeking to improve healthcare quality, promote well-being and lower costs. The CMS Innovation Center is funding a number of demonstration projects, including one to the test the effectiveness of the patient-centered medical home. While the PCMH model is only one option to accomplish the CMS Innovation Center’s goals, preliminary evidence from published research is encouraging.2 In one case, Group Health, a fully integrated delivery system in the northwest, converted one of its multiple primary care practices into a PCMH. A 12-month controlled study3 indicated that the pilot clinic’s transformation resulted in a statistically significant 11 percent reduction in hospitalizations, 29 percent reduction in ED visits and $71 in cost savings per patient for medical home members.

There is not much published research that focuses on the PCMH model in free clinics, but healthcare administrators hypothesize that the model would be effective across all primary, ambulatory and chronic care settings. Gaining PCMH recognition from the National Committee for Quality Assurance can be costly, however. As free clinics across the country strive to meet quality standards, they are beginning to search for resources to support their PCMH transformation initiatives. Hospitals have access to human and capital resources that most free clinics do not have. Some hospital executives are forming partnerships with free clinics by donating human and capital resources to support patient-centered medical home transformation initiatives. These leaders recognize that efficient free clinics can help hospitals control costs by properly managing care for the community’s underinsured patients. With an effective safety net in place for the underinsured, providers’ overall costs can be cut.

4. Clinical or administrative support. Hospitals can benefit from encouraging their employees and medical staff members to volunteer at a free clinic. For example:

  • It is a hospital’s mission to promote health and well being in the community. Hospital clinicians help their communities when they volunteer to care for underinsured, non-emergent patients outside of the ED.
  • Hospital leaders who volunteer on a free clinic’s board of directors build valuable connections and strengthen partnerships between their hospitals and the local free clinics.  

Further, the Internal Revenue Service requires not-for-profit hospitals to demonstrate a certain level of community benefit to maintain tax-exempt status. Hospitals can work toward satisfying regulatory requirements by including free clinics on medical resident  rotations or by subsidizing free clinics for medical staff salaries.

5. Donating clinical resources and services. In addition to volunteer hours, there are other ways hospitals can provide clinical support to free clinics. According to a report by the Virginia Association of Free Clinics,5 “hospitals and laboratories contributed nearly $58.6 million of in-kind services to free clinic patients in 2010,” in the state of Virginia alone.

Some hospitals support free clinics by discounting specialty referrals. Bellevue Hospital Center in New York City supports the New York City Free Clinic this way. In return, “the NYCFC pays [the] remaining cost such that all specialty referrals to Bellevue Hospital Center are free of charge to NYCFC patients.”6

A more common arrangement is a partnership in which a hospital donates laboratory, radiology or other services to a free clinic. Stephanie Garris, executive administrator of Grace Medical Home, a large free clinic in Orlando, Fla., noted how thankful she was that the two large health systems in her market donate laboratory services to her organization. Orlando Health and Florida Hospital alternate weeks to provide laboratory services to Grace Medical Home. The free clinic is also engaged in a financial data sharing arrangement with each local health system, so that it can demonstrate the value that it returns to hospitals in the form of ROI.7

In 2007, the Actuarial Research Corporation and the Kaiser Family Foundation collaborated to conduct a study, which determined that “84 percent of High ED Users (defined as four or more visits over two years) live with chronic conditions, and that 31 percent of of High ED Users’ ED visits are related to chronic conditions compared to 16 percent for Low ED Users.”8

Julie Bilodeau, director of operations of CrossOver Ministry, the largest free clinic in Richmond, Va., told how her clinic partners with local health systems to manage chronic patients to keep them out of hospitals. She told of a patient who came to CrossOver in January 2011. He complained of dry mouth, frequent urination, persistent thirst, and poor sleep. He had also lost 20 pounds in two months and was growing worried. Dr. Dageforde, one of CrossOver Ministry’s volunteer physicians, ran some tests that were funded by a partner hospital’s laboratories and discovered that his patient’s blood sugar was 333, and his A1C was off the charts. The patient was diagnosed by the free clinic with Type 2 diabetes. CrossOver provided him with insulin, a glucose monitor, strips, needles and other supplies necessary to manage his condition. CrossOver nurses and physicians also took the time to educate the patient about lifestyle changes that would help him live a healthy life. The patient began eating healthy and exercising regularly. Today, the patient is in excellent control of his diabetes, is living a healthy and productive life and holds a steady job at a local restaurant. Upon the patient’s most recent visit to CrossOver, in November 2012, the patient recorded an A1C of 6.6, nearly within the healthy range for an adult without diabetes. This particular patient is a constant reminder of the challenges that free clinic patients face without access to healthcare (in this case hospital laboratory services), and how better health education can make a dramatic impact on lives. Ms. Bilodeau’s practical example supports the findings of the Actuarial Research Corporation and the Kaiser Family Foundation that well-managed free clinics can reduce hospital costs.

Clearly, there are many ways hospitals can partner with free clinics to better serve patients while controlling costs. Some types of partnerships require an upfront investment from the hospital, but in the long run, these partnerships can be mutually beneficial and represent true win-wins.

 

About Morgan Hunter HealthSearch
Morgan Hunter HealthSearch (MHHS) provides Executive Search and Interim Leadership solutions for hospitals and health systems throughout the United States.  Our services include executive healthcare recruiting, retained healthcare executive search, healthcare interim management, executive placement for hospitals

Incentivizing Physicians for Quality Through Data, Compensation and Cultural Redefinition

February 11th, 2013

Written by Imran Andrabi, MD, Senior Vice President and Chief Physician Executive Officer, Mercy  | February 04, 2013

Physicians play a critical role in quality improvement at hospitals and health systems. Incentivizing physicians to improve quality and help meet the organization’s goals is essential to a hospital’s and health system’s success in enhancing performance.

Dr. Imran Andrabi issenior vice president and chief physician executive officer of Toledo, Ohio-based Mercy.Educate physicians that accountability for quality is happening now

First and foremost, incentivizing physicians to engage in quality improvement needs to begin with education and definition of the new reality. It’s important for hospitals/health systems to make sure physicians are aware of the state of healthcare quality across the country and the new requirements for quality and patient safety, clinical documentation, billing, coding and reimbursement practices as well as the organization’s quality-related goals so physicians can become part and parcel of these efforts. Fortunately, there are some physicians, as in any cohort, who truly understand and become champions of quality. There are others who feel they already do a quality job, have nothing else to learn and believe quality really is the health system’s issue. Hospitals have to make sure physicians understand the healthcare industry’s quality focus is here to stay in a very meaningful way and will change significantly how physicians will be paid and held accountable for their work. This is where we will move from volume of work done to value of the work product

One of the challenges is that there’s been a lot of discussion and rhetoric about improving quality for a very long time, but it hasn’t really impacted the physicians directly in a meaningful way until now. It is extremely important to make sure physicians understand that accountability for care in a high-quality, low-cost manner has finally become a reality.

Data analytics sparks competitive nature

Incentivizing physicians also requires hospitals and health systems provide dependable data analytics to physicians so they understand their work product better. Comparing data on their performance to their peers’ performance is a great motivating force for physicians, because by nature they are very competitive and don’t like to not be in the top tier of performance.

However, it’s important that hospitals and health systems not only give physicians data once in a while in an ad-hoc manner, but ensure that there’s a good feedback loop for giving them data as close to real time as possible. That data should be relevant and meaningful to the physicians and tie back to their goals and the goals of the system so that they may utilize the data to continuously improve their practice. For example, Mercy physicians can access data via a program called Crimson, which is part of the Advisory Board Company. Crimson provides a significant amount of quality process improvement, financial and clinical data to physicians.

Through this program, we’re educating physicians and giving them access to their own data in real time. They don’t have to be dependent on us to provide data, but can analyze their data themselves and learn from it. They can understand how they’re performing relative to not only their own cohorts but also relative to their own specialty across hospitals in the database and relative to national benchmarks. This is a great learning tool that also generates questions and dialogue amongst physicians, between chiefs of staff and chairs of departments and the members of the departments. Crimson data is available in the ambulatory setting as well. This is just one example of the various tools out there that can do the same type of reporting for systems.

We’ve also just invested in another database called Explorys that is available in ambulatory practices. It downloads data from our electronic health record every 24 hours, so our physicians have access to their performance data relative to their group, to their specialty, to the cohort and national quality benchmarks.

We see the ability to compare performance data as a great incentive and motivating force for physicians to improve their performance.  

You can’t improve what you can’t measure and share with those who need to improve it.

Leadership positions and engagement motivate physicians

Another strategy to incentivize physicians is giving them leadership positions within quality to help engage them in dialogue, design, implementation, measurement, peer engagement and execution. Traditionally we have had physicians as chairs of a department, chiefs of staff and chief medical officers. That’s great; but, I think physicians also need to move into a chief quality role, both in a formal and an informal leadership capacity

When physicians lead quality initiatives, the projects aren’t looked upon as something the administration is telling physicians to do, rather as something physicians tackle with their peers. At Mercy, we have physician quality teams in the hospital and on the ambulatory side looking at quality and providing feedback. Developing teams of physicians that review data and give feedback helps significantly in moving the quality agenda forward. Physicians at Mercy are engaged in every aspect of quality, from governance to risk management to peer review to development of new quality initiatives that continuously make us the preferred place to practice and take care of patients.

Financial incentives can change behavior

Incentives can also be a motivator for physicians. We are using them particularly with those employed by us, by not only compensating for seeing patients, but for seeing patients and providing high-quality care with a superior care experience. Hospitals’ compensation structures should have clearly defined quality metrics, which may be different in primary care compared with specialty practice. For example, in primary care there are specific quality metrics built into patient-centered medical homes that we have embarked on and will significantly impact the care and access provided to our patient. Additionally, the metrics will allow our physicians to practice at the top of their license and be partners in quality finance. On the specialty side, we are in the process of developing specific quality metrics by specialty that compensation will be tied to. Our goal is to ultimately have almost 30 percent of our physicians’ compensation tied to quality and outcomes.

In addition, we need to make sure the quality metrics we’re looking at are aligned with the overall quality goals of the organization and where healthcare is moving from a big picture perspective. We have a robust process where we set quality goals on a yearly basis throughout Catholic Health Partners as a system, and then they are cascaded out to each hospital through our board and the medical executive committees to make sure everybody understands the objectives and to align incentives to ensure the best outcomes. The same types of metrics are utilized in the ambulatory setting. As we move to ACOs, clinical integration quality will be measured not only with the component parts of the organization, but across the entire organization. In the era of ACOs and bundled payments, quality performance standards are a must-have.

Quality-focused culture

Whatever we do to incentivize physicians for quality, we need to do it with a long view in mind. We have to make sure we have the right culture and that through processes and structures we enable people to do the right thing the first time while making it difficult to do something wrong.

Successfully incentivizing physicians to improve quality ultimately depends on having a strong culture of quality. In healthcare, all people who deliver care become part of the quality team. Not only physicians, but nursing staff and ancillary staff embrace the fact that quality is our job; it’s not just delegated to the quality department. Physicians are a piece of it — an important piece — but developing the structure, the mindsets, the focus and the culture is number one.

Imran Andrabi, MD, serves as senior vice president and chief physician executive officer of Toledo, Ohio-based Mercy, part of Catholic Health Partners. He previously served as president and CEO of Mercy St. Vincent Medical Center in Toledo. He is a diplomat of the American Board of Family Medicine and the American Board of Managed Care Medicine.

 

About Morgan Hunter HealthSearch
Morgan Hunter HealthSearch (MHHS) provides Executive Search and Interim Leadership solutions for hospitals and health systems throughout the United States.  Our services include executive healthcare recruiting, retained healthcare executive search, healthcare interim management, executive placement for hospitals

5 Things the Most Extraordinary Hospital CEOs Do

February 11th, 2013

Written by Molly Gamble | February 04, 2013, Becker’s Hospital Review

There isn’t a trusted scorecard to accurately assess a healthcare CEO’s performance. But there are a handful of skills the most remarkable leaders know and demonstrate every day in the C-suite. Quint Studer, founder of Studer Group, says he’s observed five skills and abilities that the most effective hospital and health system CEOs predictably demonstrate.

1. Extraordinary CEOs objectively diagnose the organization’s ailments. The ability to properly identify and assess problems is the foundation of healthcare. Much like physicians and other healthcare professionals, CEOs are expected to properly diagnose the “illness” before they can apply the “cure.”

The best hospital and health system CEOs objectively identify problems within their organizations and constantly push employees to improve or maintain top performance. Why isn’t this a habit among all CEOs? Proximity and poor estimation, says Mr. Studer.

“Leaders can sometimes be ‘too close’ to the organization to objectively assess its performance,” he says. “As a result, they’ll overestimate and think their leadership and the hospital’s performance is better than it is.”

For example, in a recent Studer Group survey based on responses from more than 300 hospital and health system CEOs, a number of leaders identified clinical quality of care as their organization’s number one strength. Upon closer inspection of those organizations’ quality metrics and information, Studer Group found many of those CEOs had overestimated their clinical performance.  

Such overconfidence is fairly common among CEOs, he says, and it’s a major flaw that will wreak havoc throughout the hospital or system. “Top CEOs have a responsibility to objectively self-assess themselves and their organization,” says Mr. Studer. “That’s critical.”

2. They drive variability out of leadership. Much has been written about variation within healthcare delivery and clinical care, but variability within management and administration has received far less scrutiny. That’s too bad, says Mr. Studer, as leadership inconsistencies at any level can harm employee morale, turnover, talent selection and hiring.

“When we ask CEOs to evaluate their senior leadership teams, we ask them to measure consistency in system-wide leadership practices on a scale of one to 10,” he explains. “The average we see is a 5.5. We recommend CEOs and senior leaders sit down and decide which leadership practices are absolutely mandatory — and then, standardize them.”

One common problem? Meetings. “There are too many meetings that are too long and not well-organized,” says Mr. Studer. “Yet, despite these problems, most leaders do not follow meeting templates or agendas. When inconsistencies like this linger at the top of the organization, they tend to trickle down throughout the rest of the hospital or system.”

What’s more, a single executive who strays from standardized procedures can hold the entire organization back. Mr. Studer says he worked with 11 executives at an organization that wanted to reduce its turnover. Even though turnover decreased and stabilized, the rate was still higher than what the organization set out to reach. “When we dug into it, we found we had one senior leader who didn’t follow the new program,” says Mr. Studer. “The turnover rate stagnated because that senior leader wasn’t following agreed-upon practices.”

3. They align their outlook with their organization’s outlook.
Say you called 20 hospital CEOs and another 20 hospital managers, supervisors and directors and asked these two groups, “Will the healthcare environment in the next five years be very difficult, difficult, the same, easy or very easy?” Mr. Studer says most CEOs and executive team members respond with “very difficult” to “difficult,” while managers are more likely to say “difficult” to “the same.”

CEOs and managers have different responsibilities and workloads, so it is to be expected that their outlooks will not match. Yet, this gap in urgency can ultimately make an organization fail. Narrowing this gap comes down to how well CEOs communicate the pressures their organizations face in the moment, as well as those that are on the way.

“CEOs must communicate the healthcare environment to every stakeholder so they can align their sense of urgency,” he says. “You can’t be successful if four out of 10 leaders aren’t willing to change.”

4. They don’t underestimate how change affects employees. Recently, Mr. Studer visited a hospital that was constructing a new multi-million-dollar facility on its campus. He noted how closely hospital management followed the construction process and tracked its progress. Yet very rarely is such steady and detailed attention paid to changes or initiatives among employees, he points out.

“We micromanage construction projects but we don’t micromanage human processes,” says Mr. Studer. “That’s a mistake, because human change is the key to everything.”

Mr. Studer describes four categories of employees. First are the unconsciously incompetent, or those who don’t know what they don’t know. Then there are the consciously incompetent, or people who know what they don’t know; followed by the consciously competent, who are beginning to master the process; and finally the unconsciously competent. Processes come naturally to this last group. They can cook a dish without looking at the recipe.

A major misunderstanding in healthcare management is to assume the organization’s high performers, or the unconsciously competent employees, will have the easiest time changing their processes. The best CEOs know this is not so.

“High performers have been doing that process for such a long time, it’s become a habit,” says Mr. Studer. “They already feel successful, so what they don’t want to do is go backwards and feel like they’re starting over. CEOs can underestimate how hard a change will be, even for high performers.”

This dynamic can explain why a hospital’s top-performing physicians may have such a difficult time adjusting their workflow or working with new electronic medical record software, for instance. The four categories also apply to executives, and Mr. Studer says CEOs can apply the same test to their senior management team to determine how each member might react to change.

The most remarkable leaders in healthcare understand the complexity involved in change and take it very seriously, adds Mr. Studer.

5. They consistently manage employee performance. By communicating and upholding clear expectations for direct reports, CEOs can drive a culture of accountability that permeates the entire organization. Tolerating low performers is a fatal flaw for all organizations, but especially for those in healthcare that hold patients’ lives in their hands. And along with their ethical obligation to patients, hospitals should address low performers so they do not bring other employees down.

“When we do surveys, we typically find that 8 percent of the people in an organization are not meeting performance expectations,” says Mr. Studer. “And 50 percent of that group are not in any performance counseling. There is no documentation in their file showing any form of corrective or disciplinary action.”

Incidentally, Studer Group studies have found organizations with leaders who report a high number of low-performing employees also have lower HCAHPS scores.

Part of creating a highly reliable organization is consistently addressing low performance, from the senior level team to hospital staff. The best CEOs uphold the value of accountability to drive performance management throughout the organization.

“These five things not only set a CEO apart from the rest in terms of leadership and vision, but also make our hospitals and health systems safer, financially stronger and more able to quickly respond to the changes facing today’s healthcare industry,” says Mr. Studer.

 

About Morgan Hunter HealthSearch
Morgan Hunter HealthSearch (MHHS) provides Executive Search and Interim Leadership solutions for hospitals and health systems throughout the United States.  Our services include executive healthcare recruiting, retained healthcare executive search, healthcare interim management, executive placement for hospitals

18 Recent Medicare, Medicaid Issues

February 11th, 2013

Written by Bob Herman | February 08, 2013, Becker’s Hospital Review

Here are 18 issues dealing with Medicare or Medicaid that occurred in the past week, starting with the most recent.

1. CMS issued its annual Medicare Recovery Auditor report to Congress, confirming that recovery audit contractors collected $797.4 million in overpayments from hospitals and other providers and repaid $141.9 million in underpayments in fiscal year 2011.

2. For the second time, President Barack Obama nominated Marilyn Tavenner to lead CMS.

3. CMS announced changes to its Medicare Medically Unlikely Edits program, which screens claims for likely errors under Part B to avoid excess payments.

4. Fourteen hospitals across Texas asked the state Supreme Court that the Texas Health and Human Services Commission recalculate Medicaid reimbursements for fiscal years 2008 and 2009.

5. The state Senates in both Oklahoma and Utah agreed to extend hospital provider fees, which have raised hundreds of millions of dollars in extra Medicaid reimbursement.

6. U.S. Reps. Joe Heck, DO (R-Nev.), and Allyson Schwartz (D-Pa.) introduced new legislation that would permanently repeal the sustainable growth rate, which dictates Medicare reimbursement to physicians.

7. Healthcare spending on Medicare and Medicaid has grown slower than many have predicted, and the most recent report from the Congressional Budget Office showed federal spending for the two programs was 5 percent lower than it estimated in March 2010.

8. In an address, President Barack Obama urged Congress members to find a “balanced mix of spending cuts and tax reform” in order to avoid impending automatic budget cuts.

9. Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder became the sixth GOP governor to recommend an expansion of the state’s Medicaid program to include individuals slightly above the poverty line.

10. HHS and CMS issued a proposed rule that would modify or eliminate Medicare regulations deemed to be unnecessary or obsolete — reforms the government expects will save hospitals and healthcare providers up to $676 million per year and $3.4 billion over five years.

11. Cleveland-based safety-net health system MetroHealth was approved to operate a Medicaid waiver program that will allow up to 30,000 Ohioans who fall under 133 percent of the federal poverty line to obtain free healthcare coverage.

12. CMS announced a new initiative to improve care for Medicare beneficiaries with end-stage renal disease.

13. Sens. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) and Tom Coburn, MD (R-Okla.), introduced a bill that would sunset Section 3141 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act — a controversial provision that sets the Medicare hospital wage index floor for the entire country.

14. Kansas moved its Medicaid recipients at the start of this year onto a flat-fee managed care program called KanCare, in hopes the switch would lower costs or slow growth in spending for its Medicaid population. 

15. Six lawmakers from both sides of the aisle released a report outlining recommendations from more than 160 stakeholders on methods to combat fraud and abuse in the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

16. HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius stressed federal funding for states that expand their Medicaid programs to include more poor residents will be protected from budget battles.

17. CMS released its final rule that will require drug, device, biologic and medical supply manufacturers to report payments and gifts they provide to physicians and teaching hospitals — better known as the Sunshine Act.

18. Tampa, Fla.-based health insurer WellCare Health Plans completed its acquisition of Minnetonka, Minn.-based health giant UnitedHealthcare’s Medicaid business in South Carolina.

 

About Morgan Hunter HealthSearch
Morgan Hunter HealthSearch (MHHS) provides Executive Search and Interim Leadership solutions for hospitals and health systems throughout the United States.  Our services include executive healthcare recruiting, retained healthcare executive search, healthcare interim management, executive placement for hospitals

3 Non-Provider Forces Hospitals Can Expect More From in 2013

January 29th, 2013

Written by Molly Gamble | January 28, 2013, Becker’s Hospital Review

In the past few years, there has been a heightened focus on collaborative ties between hospitals and other providers. Hospitals have attuned their strategies to include various affiliations, clinical relationships and other community-based partnerships. But to become and remain a multidimensional and cost-effective center for health, hospitals should be mindful of relationships with entities that fall outside of the provider category, as well.

Here, Joe Albian, partner in PwC’s Health Industries Advisory practice, shares insight on a few players that are likely to leave large impressions in the healthcare industry and hospitals’ strategies in the year ahead.

1. Employers driving more value. Employers face some hefty decisions around healthcare benefits in the year ahead, especially due to the financial effects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s mandates.

A range of the reform law’s provisions have strengthened access to coverage for people without employer-sponsored health plans, meaning employers are beginning to treat state insurance exchanges as possible safety-net coverage and are no longer treating it as something that is core to their business strategy. According to a PwC report, a recent third-party survey found only 23 percent of employers are very confident their organization will offer healthcare benefits a decade from now — a significant drop from 73 percent in 2007.

Mr. Albian says employers’ participation in accountable care organizations and other models may pick up traction in the years ahead. Employers have an incentive to save resources and manage employee health in a way that minimizes costs but drives quality outcomes. “I think this is still going to be an area where employers can add an awful lot to the dialogue that they haven’t [up until] this point,” says to Mr. Albian. “With major provider organizations, [employers] can influence ACOs significantly.”

For instance, employers may find more sophisticated ways to utilize a provider’s clinical data from an ACO and make that information more valuable to their bottom line and employees’ behavior, acting as partners with providers to enhance employees’ productivity. “I think employers have the opportunity to drive something that is much more engaging,” says Mr. Albian.

2. The rise of the healthcare consumer.
Hospitals and health systems are feeling the pinch as nearly one-third of the federal government’s Value-Based Purchasing Program connects to consumer experience and satisfaction. The program ties 30 percent of Medicare reimbursement performance on certain metrics from the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores. The remaining 70 percent will be tied to performance in 12 core measures, such as pneumonia, heart attack and heart-failure care. In fiscal year 2013, the program will distribute an estimated $850 million to hospitals.

But the federal program is one small wave in a larger sea change, in which hospitals adopt more retail-like behaviors and drive a deeper understanding of their patients’ behavior and preferences. In short, value-based purchasing is only a sign of what’s to come, according to Mr. Albian.

“Traditional surveying mechanisms, while good, are not going to be traditional retail models going forward,” says Mr. Albian. “I think our hospitals will need to think differently in how to engage consumers. They should play a much deeper role in how value is viewed — not simply by a [post-visit] survey.”

Hospitals’ need for a more sophisticated consumer understanding presents a large opportunity for organizations, but it also demands significant investment and experience, according to Mr. Albian. For instance, few hospitals employ chief experience officers as part of their senior-level management teams, and Mr. Albian expects that to change in the coming years. Chief experience officers work to ensure patients are satisfied with their experience and provide coaching to hospital staff on patient-provider communication.

Consumers’ expectations for convenient healthcare won’t waver any time soon, either. In the year ahead, providers can expect to see continued growth in consumers’ use of retail clinics for minor ailments or routine services, such as flu shots. Patient preference for clinics located in pharmacies, grocery stores or even their workplaces has steadily grown in the past four years, according to a recent study. Twenty-seven percent of adults indicated they visited a retail clinic in the past two years compared with 7 percent of adults in 2008.

3. More innovative connections with other sectors. Two other players are expected to play growing roles in hospitals’ and health systems’ strategies in the year ahead: pharmaceutical companies and mobile health devices.

Mr. Albian says there are “massive opportunities” for new business models between hospitals and the pharmaceutical industry, especially in light of ACOs. Up until this point, most ACO conversations have revolved around providers and payors. Health information technology and analytics are more embedded in most ACOs than pharma.

Moving forward, more providers may analyze how a pharmaceutical organization’s services fit within the framework of a certain disease management program, evidence-based medicine and reducing total costs of care. Pharmaceutical costs represent a hefty portion of spending that providers can further drive down through these partnerships.

For example, a pharmaceutical organization may be able to design clinical protocol for patients with certain conditions, or coordinate care between hospital visits and visits to retail clinics in pharmacy settings. Recently, Walgreen Co. became the first national pharmacy chain to receive CMS-approval for participation in a Medicare Shared Savings ACO, in which the pharmacy chain will work with physician groups in New Jersey, Texas and Florida.  

Another consumer demand that providers have not yet met is that of mobile health, or accessing electronic health records through personal devices. “Consumers want access to mobile information, and providers aren’t yet ready for it,” says Mr. Albian.

The use of personal devices internally is also anticipated to make a dent financially, as one PwC study found that supporting employees’ mobile devices can cost companies 33 percent more. Additionally, only about 46 percent of providers have a strategy regulating the use of mobile devices, according to PwC data.

Conclusion
Although they are not providers, employers, consumers, pharmaceutical companies and mobile health technology are becoming more top-of-mind for hospitals and strategists. As hospitals and health systems move forward in their third year under the PPACA, it will be interesting to watch how and what innovative relationships with these players take shape. There has already been some activity in each of the three sectors discussed, and a “huge amount of opportunity” remains, according to Mr. Albian.

 

About Morgan Hunter HealthSearch
Morgan Hunter HealthSearch (MHHS) provides Executive Search and Interim Leadership solutions for hospitals and health systems throughout the United States.  Our services include executive healthcare recruiting, retained healthcare executive search, healthcare interim management, executive placement for hospitals

20 Statistics on Hospital Readmissions

January 29th, 2013

Written by Sabrina Rodak | January 23, 2013, Becker’s Hospital Review

Readmissions are a significant concern for hospitals, as they will receive cuts to their Medicare payments for higher-than-expected readmission rates for certain diagnoses.

Here are 20 statistics on hospital readmissions from two studies published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

In the study titled “Diagnoses and Timing of 30-Day Readmissions After Hospitalization for Heart Failure, Acute Myocardial Infarction, or Pneumonia,” researchers studied 2007 to 2009 Medicare fee-for-service claims data for 30-day readmissions after hospitalization for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction and pneumonia. Here are their findings:

Overall readmission rates
1.    The 30-day readmission rate after heart failure hospitalization was 24.8 percent.

2.    The 30-day readmission rate after acute myocardial infarction hospitalization was 19.9 percent.

3.    The 30-day readmission rate after pneumonia hospitalization was 18.3 percent.

4.    The average age of readmissions was 80.3 years for patients originally hospitalized for heart failure, 79.8 years for patients originally hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction and 80 years for patients originally hospitalized for pneumonia.

Timing and frequency
5.    The majority of all readmissions occurred within 15 days of hospitalization: Sixty-one percent of heart failure readmissions, 67.6 percent of acute myocardial infarction readmissions and 62.6 percent of pneumonia readmissions occurred in this time period.

6.    Among all readmissions, approximately one-third occurred from day 16 through day 30 post-hospitalization.

7.    The median time period between hospitalization and readmission was 12 days for heart failure patients, 10 days for acute myocardial infarction patients and 12 days for pneumonia patients.

8.    Of readmissions after a heart failure hospitalization, 87.5 percent were readmitted once, 9.7 percent were readmitted twice and 2.8 percent were readmitted three or more times.

9.    Of readmissions after an acute myocardial infarction hospitalization, 97.4 percent were readmitted once, 2.4 percent were readmitted twice and 0.2 percent were readmitted three or more times.

10.    Of readmissions after a pneumonia hospitalization, 95.1 percent were readmitted once, 4.3 percent were readmitted twice and 0.6 percent were readmitted three or more times.

Readmission diagnoses
11.    Of readmissions after a heart failure hospitalization, the most common diagnosis was heart failure at 35.2 percent.

12.    Of readmissions after an acute myocardial infarction hospitalization, the most common diagnosis was heart failure at 19.3 percent.

13.    Of readmissions after a pneumonia hospitalization, the most common diagnosis was recurrent pneumonia 22.4 percent.

14.    Cardiovascular disease was the cause of 52.8 percent of readmissions after heart failure hospitalization and 53.4 percent of readmissions after acute myocardial infarction hospitalization.

15.    Respiratory disease accounted for 38.5 percent of readmissions after pneumonia hospitalization.

16.    The five most common readmission diagnoses accounted for 55.9 percent for heart failure readmissions, 44.3 percent of acute myocardial infarction readmissions and 49.6 percent of pneumonia readmissions.

In the study titled “Pediatric Readmission Prevalence and Variability Across Hospitals,” researchers studied 568,845 admissions at 72 children’s hospitals between July 1, 2009 and June 30, 2010. The authors categorized hospitals as having high readmission rates if the rates were one standard deviation above the mean, and low readmission rates if they were one standard deviation below the mean. The researchers found the following:

17.    The 30-day unadjusted readmission rate for all hospitalized children was 6.5 percent.

18.    The adjusted 30-day readmission rate for hospitals with high readmission rates were 7.2 percent compared with 5.6 percent for low-readmission hospitals — a difference of 28.6 percent.

19.    Adjusted 30-day readmission rates for the 10 admission diagnoses with the highest readmission prevalence were 17 percent to 66 percent greater in hospitals with high readmission rates compared with hospitals with low readmission rates.

20.    The 30-day readmission rate for sickle cell, one of the 10 diagnoses with the highest rate of readmissions, were 20.1 percent in hospitals with high readmission rates and 12.7 percent in hospitals with low readmission rates.

 About Morgan Hunter HealthSearch
Morgan Hunter HealthSearch (MHHS) provides Executive Search and Interim Leadership solutions for hospitals and health systems throughout the United States.  Our services include executive healthcare recruiting, retained healthcare executive search, healthcare interim management, executive placement for hospitals

Patients need to be involved in quality metrics

January 29th, 2013

| Physician | January 26, 2013, KevinMD.com

I recently heard from an aging and respected physician the old adage that “what is good for the doctor is good for the patient.” The room full of physicians of all ages and specialties nodded their heads in agreement. This saddened me, as it represents a physician-centric system that oftentimes leaves the patient’s needs and desires completely out of the equation.

 An area of emerging importance in medicine, whose impact should be broadened in order to ensure the patient’s place in the equation, is quality improvement.  “Quality” health care is defined loosely by hundreds of very specific measurements, such as consistent testing for hemoglobin A1C in patients with diabetes mellitus or the timing of antibiotics for surgery, which perpetuate this physician-centric paradigm within our health care system.  Consistent hemoglobin testing and proper timing of antibiotics in surgery are absolutely important for the health of the patient, but may not hold meaning for patients as metrics for choosing a quality physician or hospital. Quality measurements need to be meaningful and understandable to patients if they are to use them to improve their well-being and to select doctors who share their vision of health.

Multiple studies have shown that most patients desire a competent, knowledgeable, and caring physician. They want to know that the advice and care they receive is based on what is best for their health, as opposed to what is best for the physician’s bottom line.  And patients repeatedly say they are most interested in providers they can trust, who have an easy and approachable bedside manner, and who properly communicate with them. But such traits, including empathy, kindness and patience, are not currently considered essential measures of quality by anyone but the patient.

While hospital performance scores are slowly becoming available for potential patients to consider, reliable quality measures on outpatient primary-care providers (PCPs), where there is much greater need and variation, are severely lacking. And because the majority of metrics used to define a quality provider, when they are made available, have little meaning to the average patient, patients often fail to see the importance of seeking out a “qualified” physician or how to do so.

The combination of multiple, provider-centric metrics of quality and the difficulty for individual patients to access and understand this information has led to a sense of confusion among patients and physicians alike as to what quality health care actually is. Most measures do not apply to most patients, and those that do apply typically show that most providers are good at some metrics and poorer at others. But most importantly, the issues that tend to be of most concern to patients, such as the above-mentioned trust and bedside manner, are not included. This provides little help to patients in their search for a quality PCP to assist them in achieving optimal health.

There is legitimate concern that based on current quality measures patients may seek out multiple providers for separate and relatively simple issues. A patient may select one provider who is better with diabetes and another who achieves better scores in hypertension. Or a patient may seek costly care from a specialist over an acceptable PCP for a given condition. This could lead to further degradation of the physician-patient relationship through less continuity of care, while increasing cost and time for patients and providers, even though the “quality” of care will appear improved.

In order to make the measured quality accessible to patients, patients need to be involved in the creation and implementation of quality metrics that have meaning to them. The primary method by which patients participate in the quality process now is via patient satisfaction surveys. Medical practices or independent organizations often solicit patient feedback on what could make things more patient-friendly. These forums, however, are often misleading as they have inherent selection bias of both extremes – either very good or very bad isolated experiences are most commonly shared, with multiple confounders. And in these surveys, patients are reacting to existing constraints as opposed to creating patient-centered experiences. What’s more, feedback from these surveys is typically considered a “patient satisfaction” issue, which is separate from quality. The patient satisfaction survey treats the patient as merely a customer in a business instead of an integral part of the physician-patient relationship. But patients react best when they feel that their provider has their best interests at heart and is not acting out of motivations for improved numbers or increased income, as one would in a business-client relationship. Instead of treating patients as customers, patients should be treated as equal partners in quality improvement for their own health.

Certainly patients should not control every aspect of quality measurement to the exclusion of important health-related factors. Providers should still be expected to take the lead and act as educator and coach. But if it is going to produce any fruitful results, it must be a partnership with patients and not a dictation to them. This concept continues to gain importance as medical practice redesign moves towards patient-centered medical homes (PCMH) and accountable care organizations (ACOs), and their increased emphases on primary care. Patients need to feel that it is their medical home, as opposed to being told what and where their medical home is. Otherwise we can expect patients to continue to seek care from multiple providers, leading to duplicate tests and visits, increased costs, wasted time, and further alienation of patients from the care they want and need.

The emphasis on quality in health care is extremely important, but if we continue to focus only on the physician end of the equation, then we will fail to learn the fundamental lesson of effective medicine: that what is good for the patient is good for the doctor.

Kyle Bradford Jones is a family physician who blogs at Primary Care Progress.

 

About Morgan Hunter HealthSearch
Morgan Hunter HealthSearch (MHHS) provides Executive Search and Interim Leadership solutions for hospitals and health systems throughout the United States.  Our services include executive healthcare recruiting, retained healthcare executive search, healthcare interim management, executive placement for hospitals

Follow Us: Facebook LinkedIn LinkedIn